Complications Gastrojejunostomy Tubes |
| Gastrojejunostomy
(GJ) tubes are essential for providing enteral nutrition to patients
with gastric feeding intolerance, including those with severe
gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), neurologic impairment, or
dysmotility disorders. Despite their advantages, GJ tubes come with a
host of complications that can significantly impact patient care and
quality of life. These complications can be broadly categorized into
mechanical failures, infections, gastrointestinal issues, and
procedural risks. Mechanical complications are among the most common issues faced by patients with GJ tubes. Tube dislodgement frequently occurs, often necessitating urgent replacement. Studies indicate that younger children and those with neurologic impairment are particularly susceptible to tube migration, leading to ineffective feeding and increased medical interventions. Tube obstruction is another significant problem, primarily due to medication residues or enteral nutrition formulas. Emergency department visits related to tube occlusion are reported in a substantial percentage of cases, underscoring the need for routine flushing protocols. Additionally, balloon rupture and leakage at the insertion site lead to increased morbidity, causing peristomal skin irritation and the formation of granulation tissue. Infectious and inflammatory complications also pose a major concern. Peristomal infections are frequently reported, particularly in immunocompromised patients, with some studies citing infection rates as high as 25%. Granulation tissue formation, a chronic inflammatory response to irritation, occurs in a significant proportion of cases, sometimes requiring cauterization or surgical revision. Furthermore, aspiration pneumonia remains a notable risk, despite the postpyloric positioning of GJ tubes. Hospitalization due to aspiration-related complications is reported in nearly a quarter of pediatric GJ tube patients, indicating that while these tubes reduce reflux, they do not entirely eliminate aspiration risk. Gastrointestinal complications can be severe, with intestinal perforation being one of the most alarming outcomes. The risk of perforation is disproportionately higher in infants weighing less than 10 kg, and cases often require surgical intervention. Another serious complication is intussusception, where the jejunal limb of the GJ tube serves as a lead point for bowel telescoping, potentially leading to ischemia. Though relatively rare, gastrocolic fistula formation is another dangerous outcome of prolonged GJ tube use or misplacement, manifesting as severe diarrhea and malnutrition. Procedural risks associated with GJ tubes cannot be ignored. Placement and replacements often require fluoroscopic guidance, leading to cumulative radiation exposure. Patients undergoing multiple tube replacements per year may be at risk for long-term radiation-related complications. The necessity for procedural sedation in younger patients further compounds the risks, necessitating careful clinical judgment regarding tube exchanges. Mitigating these complications requires a multifaceted approach. Routine tube changes at six-to-twelve-month intervals have been associated with lower rates of emergency interventions and reduced radiation exposure. Proper placement techniques, including fluoroscopic or endoscopic-assisted insertions, help minimize malposition-related complications. Additionally, caregiver education plays a crucial role in reducing complications by ensuring proper tube maintenance, medication administration, and early identification of potential issues. GJ tubes serve as a critical intervention for patients who cannot tolerate gastric feeding, but their use is accompanied by significant risks. Awareness and proactive management of these complications are essential to optimize patient outcomes and improve quality of life. By implementing routine monitoring, optimizing placement techniques, and providing thorough caregiver education, healthcare providers can mitigate the challenges associated with GJ tube use and enhance patient safety. References: 1- Demehri FR, Simha S, Herrman E, Jarboe MD, Geiger JD, Teitelbaum DH, Gadepalli SK: Analysis of risk factors contributing to morbidity from gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes in children. J Pediatr Surg. 51(6):1005-9, 2016 2- Morse J, Baird R, Muchantef K, Levesque D, Morinville V, Puligandla PS: Gastrojejunostomy tube complications - A single center experience and systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 52(5):726-733, 2017 3- Ronning MM, Gaillard P, Wey A, Roback MG: Comparison of Emergency Department Visits for Complications of Gastrostomy Versus Gastrojejunostomy Tubes in Children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 33(10):e71-e74, 2017 4- Kumbhar SS, Plunk MR, Nikam R, Boyd KP, Thakrar PD: Complications of percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tubes in children. Pediatr Radiol. 50(3):404-414, 2020 5- Hoang TT, Maroo S, Lee EJ, Dewan T, Heran M, Avinashi V: Routine Elective Gastrojejunostomy Tube Changes Are Associated With Reduced Tube Complications and Radiation Exposure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 76(1):80-83, 2023 6- Zhao OS, Shipe ME, Danko ME, Huang EY, Robindon JR. Complication Rates and Variability in Gastrojejunostomy Tube Usage in Infants and Children. J Pediatr Surg. 60:162047, 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|